What should be done if different references conflict in their recommendations regarding a particular hazardous material?

When faced with conflicting recommendations from different references regarding a hazardous material, taking the most conservative recommended course of action is often the best approach. This strategy minimizes the risk to responders and the public by adhering to the most cautious guidelines in potentially dangerous situations.

Taking the most conservative approach means that you prioritize safety, adhering to recommendations that err on the side of caution. This helps ensure that actions taken do not inadvertently expose individuals or the environment to greater danger, especially when the severity of hazards may not be fully understood or when dealing with unfamiliar materials.

While senior officials may have valuable experience, their recommendations should ideally be based on the best available data and guidelines. Similarly, simply assuming the safest option is correct or consulting local law enforcement may not provide the specialized knowledge and guidelines needed to manage hazardous materials effectively. Safety in hazardous materials situations relies heavily on established protocols and thorough risk assessments, which the most conservative recommendation typically embodies.